Mark was a Senior Loan Officer at one of the largest Financial Institutions on the East Coast. One Monday morning in The Loan Review Committee Meeting, the Chairman of the Board’s loan was up for review. Although the Chairman met all economic qualifications of Character, Capacity, Collateral, Conditions, and Capital, he had significant investments that were controversial to Mark’s belief system. While there was unanimous confirmation from all other Committee members, Mark elected to abstain. Without viable reason to oppose, he chose not to vote based on personal principle. When asked why, Mark clearly articulated his thoughts and held his position to abstain. According to Mark, the Chairman of the Board came to his office immediately following the meeting, asked for his explanation again, and out of respect this is where Mark's ascension into Leadership began.
By no means am I suggesting any kind of conflict with Management, however, there is something to be said about standing on what you believe and being able to intelligently express your view with a sober openness to discussion. We all experience those pivotal moments when we are faced with decisions that contest our moral convictions, that delicate balance between getting ahead and doing what’s right. The question is; can we synchronistically dance with profitability and principle? Is it reasonable to believe that, as Leaders, we can do what's best for business while sustaining an acceptable degree of moral responsibility. Understanding that 'Best for Business' and 'Acceptable Degree of Moral Responsibility' is relative, do we have an innate algorithm that can serve as rule and guide to humanity? Leaders who are able to find harmony in benefit and benevolence are those Principals standing on an unwavering set of Principles. Although most of us are not there yet, we should always be aiming for our personal equilibrium of prosperity and fulfillment. Great Selling!
No comments:
Post a Comment