The challenge with a prospect honestly disclosing deficient circumstances is that they must trust us first. Some of the most impressive presentations are transparent to unethical objectives. I know ‘unethical‘ may seem extreme, however, if the prospect’s best interest is not our overriding initiative ‘unethical‘ may be appropriate. Our purpose has to be unquestionably clear to the prospect. One way to eliminate apprehension is to make ‘No‘ an option in the process. Have you ever been in front of a decision maker whose business could undoubtedly benefit from your product/service a they were not willing to even have a conversation with you? What do you think happens if we present ‘No’ as an option? “Mr. Decision Maker I would like to speak with you regarding my company’s products/services. You may or may not be able to benefit from them and it won’t cost you anything to find out. If you/your company won’t see an ROI from our products/services we’ll part as friends, if so, let’s do business and make some money. Is that fair?” Despite the risk, it does three things:
- It permits the prospect to be honest about their desire to mutually explore synergies.
- It magnifies the probability of that prospect becoming a true opportunity.
- It allows everyone to make better use of their time.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=3737a8c8-f42f-4976-97d1-853474a9711c)
No comments:
Post a Comment